Sermon Seeds: Compassionate Neighbors

Fifteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time Year C
Fifth Sunday after Pentecost (Proper 10)


Lectionary citations:
Amos 7:7-17 with Psalm 82 or
Deuteronomy 30:9-14 with Psalm 25:1-10
Colossians 1:1-14
Luke 10:25-37

Worship resources for the 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time Year C, Fifth Sunday after Pentecost (Proper 10) are at Worship Ways

Sermon Seeds

Focus Scripture:
Luke 10:25-37

Focus Theme:
Compassionate Neighbors

by Kathryn Matthews

It might be the world’s most familiar story about showing compassion even (and especially) for people we may not like: a nice little story with a nice little moral, especially for those of us who like to do good deeds for those in need.

Our story from the Gospel of Luke certainly doesn’t make our stomach churn or offend our sensibilities; in fact, we may hear it with an almost satisfied ear, as if we believe we too would surely do what the “Good” Samaritan did when he was moved by compassion to help the poor victim of highway robbery. At least, we’d like to think we would.

In other words, when we hear this story, we put ourselves in the place of the Samaritan, and that’s a pretty comfortable place to be. Reading enough commentaries on this familiar passage, however, will lead one to feel a bit less reassured, as if we are in unfamiliar territory, and on dangerous ground.

In what spirit do they ask?

To begin with, preachers have to deal with all sorts of perplexing disagreements among the scholars: was the question put to Jesus by the lawyer in sincerity, in respectful argument (what we might call a fruitful debate), or did it involved entrapment and shame? Maybe the answer to that question is less important than Jesus’ answer to the lawyer’s question: faithfulness has to do with what we do, not just what we say.

Indeed, we might hear this as an ancient version of “walking the talk,” as Richard Swanson translates Jesus’ final instruction to the lawyer (“go and do likewise”) with the word, “walk,” because the Hebrew words for “walk” (halak) is used to speak of doing Torah (Provoking the Gospel of Luke).

This prompts all sorts of interesting questions about grace, and about salvation being predicated on accepting Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Jesus, however, doesn’t mention these when he instructs the lawyer to “go and do likewise.”

Pointing to the goodness of God

There is also the issue of the Pharisee’s attempt to “justify himself,” which we may hear with different ears than a Jewish audience of Jesus’ or Luke’s day. “In such a context,” Swanson writes, “‘be justified’ ought rather to be translated as ‘be strictly observant,’ which means to live a life shaped by Torah, a life which points to the goodness of God and the possibility of safety” (Provoking the Gospel of Luke).

We don’t know what was in the heart of the lawyer, then, but it seems reasonable to hear in his question a request for some clear boundaries for his “neighborhood.”

Danger in unfamiliar territory

The road to Jericho doesn’t run through comfortable, familiar territory. Instead, travelers there find themselves on dangerous ground, uncertain and often, alone. Much better to stay home in Jerusalem, with one’s own kind, surrounded by the temple and the walls of the city and the institutions and community that provide what’s needed, including a safety net if anything goes wrong.

At home, we know who we are: we are “Somebody” in the web of relationships that we’ve wrapped around ourselves, and that identity gives us a lot of comfort and assurance.

Whom is it okay not to love?

Now, for the lawyer who tests Jesus, this identity draws lines around people and protects us from one another, but it also puts some reasonable limits on the possibly unreasonable demands of the Jewish Law he cares so much about obeying.

Give me some parameters, he says to Jesus, I mean, whom might it be okay not to love? After all, I’m only human…just give me a list of which people I have to take care of, and who’s on the outside of that line I need to draw around my “community of care.”

Looking for the easy, clear way

The lawyer, we imagine, continues: Yes, yes, of course I know that I need to love God — that’s a no-brainer — remember, I knew the answer to your question when you asked me what’s in the Law (I am a lawyer, after all), but give me a break, okay? Whom all do I absolutely have to love just as much as I love myself?

Who is this neighbor whose needs and welfare need to be as important to me as my own? The question itself implies, of course, that there are people who are not my neighbor, people whom it’s okay not to love.

What do we think Jesus will say?

Do you think Jesus is going to give this lawyer a pass? Do you think the Jesus we know from the Gospels and from the past two thousand years of a church struggling to be faithful, the Jesus we know from our own personal and communal relationship with him, is going to make this easy for him?

Will that Jesus say, “Well, if you can manage to love your family and friends and maybe throw a coin at a beggar every once in a while, that’s pretty good. Just be sure to worship regularly at the temple, obey all the religious laws about sexual morality, and pay your pledge every year. Then you’re all set — or as you put it, you’ll inherit eternal life, and you’ll go to heaven when you die, because, after all, you will have earned it.”

Helping with a story

No such luck. But Jesus does help the man out in his search to be faithful, to live an observant life shaped by the Torah, the Law of his people. He helps him, as he so often does, with a story.

Laws can spell things out, list them, forbid them, require them, but stories — stories get to the heart of things, to the heart of us, to that place of feeling and gut response. And Jesus goes for both the heart and the gut this time.

Who’s listening to the story?

But as we hear the story, let’s picture two other audiences for it, in addition to us today: there’s the group of people, including the lawyer, gathered around Jesus that day, presumably all or mostly Jewish people. Then there are the early Christians of Luke’s community who are trying to live their lives as followers of this Jesus, and they’re just as interested in being faithful and in knowing what that means for how they live their lives. So let’s hear the story “through their ears,” if you will, as well as our own:

All of us know the taste of fear. The traveler in Jesus’ story was probably nervous on that road from Jerusalem, and his worst fears were realized when he was set upon by bandits who beat him and robbed him and left him for dead, stripped naked and bleeding by the road.

What a nightmare, lying there helpless, hoping that someone would come to his aid…and then, Jesus said, along came a priest.

Things get tense

Now in that setting, the folks listening would have tensed up. For a lot of (good) reasons, these peasants and tax collectors and lepers and women and other pushed-out people would have resented the priestly class…Jesus hung out with sinners, we recall, with people who were “unacceptable” in the eyes of the religious elites, and that’s what the priest and the Levite were. And that may be why Jesus put them in the story.

No matter what some folks say to try to excuse them, they didn’t have to worry about ritual purity if they touched a corpse — if they were on the road away from the Temple and its rules, as Sharon Ringe observes, then that wasn’t a problem, and besides, the Law said they had to help someone in need (Luke, Westminister Bible Companion).

Besides, when so-called holiness keeps us from being compassionate, Jesus knows what true religion is, and what the Law says about helping those in need.

A priest, a Levite and an Israelite…or not

In those days, Stephen Patterson tells us, it was commonplace for a story to begin this way, “a priest and a Levite came by,” just as we might begin a story, a doctor, a lawyer and a priest walked into the bar — you know how that goes — and the people there expected to hear that the next person was an ordinary Israelite…that was the usual third person in that trio: a priest, a Levite, and an Israelite.

The first two, according to Patterson, the religious elites, were ones the Jewish audience around Jesus would have had very strong feelings about, and they would have expected them to show indifference to human suffering.

But the next one around the corner, they were sure, would be one of their own, the everyday Israelite: Yay! One of our kind, a regular guy like you and me, and he’ll come to the rescue of the poor, wounded man. He’ll save the day! (Patterson’s reflection on this text in The God of Jesus: The Historical Jesus and the Search for Meaning is particularly helpful).

A most unwelcome hero

Instead, Jesus’ audience is shocked and probably deeply offended that the hero coming around the bend is a hated Samaritan. Even the earliest Christians hearing this story would have remembered a few verses back (9:53), when a Samaritan village had refused to welcome Jesus, not a good move in a time and culture when hospitality meant everything.

Charles Cousar calls the Samaritans “half-breeds,” traitors who had colluded with Syria against the Jews (Texts for Preaching Year C). Roger E. Van Harn notes that the lawyer, even after this moving story, “could not bring himself to say the ‘Samaritan’ word” (The Lectionary Commentary: The Gospels). That’s how deep the hatred ran.

Offended sensibilities

This was a most unexpected and unwelcome hero for either audience to consider. It’s not one of our own kind who saves the day — it’s the enemy, the hated Samaritan, a guy who’s definitely on the outside of our community of care.

They don’t worship like us, they don’t hate the same people we hate or love the same people we love, they don’t live where we live, and there’s no way they should provide the hero of the piece. The stomachs in the audience are churning by this time, and the sensibilities are definitely offended.

More than enough hatred to go around

A lot of hatred, of course, is religiously based and rooted in historical things like wars and other arguments. The Samaritan had probably been taught, from his side, to hate the Jews, too. And remember that he’s in their territory, and the robbers could still be hanging around, waiting for their next victim.

But this man doesn’t let the Law, or fear, or the knowledge that he is hated keep him from what Cain Hope Felder calls a “higher righteousness.” And a higher righteousness is what Jesus is all about.

A story about us, too

I think the most moving words, and the most challenging ones, written about this story are, again, from Stephen Patterson: “You Need Your Enemy.” Jesus seems to have it all backwards: when asked what we have to do, he tells a story about us.

But he’s not talking about “us, the good Jewish lawyer,” or even “us, the ‘good’ Samaritan.” No, Jesus tells a story about us, the person lying there in the ditch. That’s the place we ought to find ourselves in, when we hear this story.

We’re the ones in the ditch

We’re lying in that ditch, and we desperately need our enemy to have compassion on us, no matter what. We need our enemy to forget what he’s been taught and what he understands his rights to be. He needs to forget the risk and the robbers, and to stop and help us in our need. He needs, Patterson says, to be moved by pity for our suffering (The God of Jesus: The Historical Jesus and the Search for Meaning).

I wonder, when I hear this story, about what might have happened to the traveler afterward. Once his wounds were healed and his family came to get him and he went home to the security and comfort of life among his own kind, I wonder if he still laughed at Samaritan jokes.

I wonder if he turned the other way when someone said unkind things about a Samaritan person, or treated them cruelly. I just wonder if his heart was broken open, permanently, long after his broken bones were healed. I wonder.

Costly, risky compassion

And that’s not all. When I think about this story, I think not just about people as individuals, long ago, and each of us today, but about communities, nations, and races, especially in this time of renewed and re-energized racial and ethnic hatreds, of immigration controversies and the suffering of refugees.

All of this suffering, all of this controversy despite the clear and numerous instructions from the Bible on this particular question: for example, “You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt” (Deuteronomy 10:19, NRSV). All of this suffering, despite the ardent claims of many in the West to be faithful Christians.

Indeed, the newspapers this week include a heartbreaking photograph of a small child, lying alone and afraid on a vast floor in a detention center here, in the United States. It is jarringly similar to the tragic picture of another small child, Alan Kurdi, a refugee of Kurdish descent from Syria, lying dead on a beach several years ago. Our compassion does seem to have its boundaries, its borders, its walls.

Crossing the lines

Bernard Brandon Scott says that we have to “cross the lines” we’ve drawn both individually and as communities, that every act of kindness, random or otherwise, toward an individual brother or sister is a starting point and an inspiration for wholesale kindness and compassion, woven into the fabric of our communities, our institutions, our world, reminding us of who we all are as beloved children of God (Re-Imagine the World).

We kick-start this kindness especially when we act in times and circumstances that are both costly and full of risk. Consider the bold witness, for example, of those who are providing water to people who are crossing the desert wilderness on our southern border. Despite threats and reports of arrest for acts that simply fulfill religious obligation and embody spiritual commitments, people of faith are following the example of that Samaritan, long ago.

Acts of courage and kindness

I once heard a story of a would-be robber in Washington who walked into a group of people having a backyard barbecue. He pointed a gun at the head of one of the women. Everyone remained very calm. One woman said, “Why don’t you point that gun at me instead of her?” He did.

They asked him, calmly, what his mother would think of what he was doing. He said, “I don’t have a mother.” Their hearts were moved to pity. They said, “I’m so sorry,” and offered him a glass of wine and some cheese. The would-be robber, with his hood down, took a sip of wine and a bite of Camembert cheese and put the gun in his sweatpants.

What happens “after”?

Then the story got even more bizarre. According to the New York Times, the man with the gun apologized and said, “Can I get a hug?” The guests stood up one by one and wrapped their arms around the man.

A few moments later the man walked away with a crystal wine glass they had given him. It was good wine, I guess, but I suspect the compassion, and the hospitality, were more powerful than even the wine. Like the traveler, and the Samaritan, we might wonder what happened to him later.

What is the point of the story?

But for our purposes, the inheriting eternal life thing, the question arises: are we talking about how to earn a place in heaven, after we die? I don’t think so. I think we are talking about an inheritance, a gift, a blessing, that we can enjoy here and now, the fullness of life, as Jesus says, all of God’s good and abundant gifts for our bodies and our souls, a sweet balm for our wounded spirits, and gladness and joy for every human heart.

We just have to open our hearts, our eyes, our minds, to these gifts all around, and then share them with one another in gratitude and joy. Let it be so.


The Rev. Kathryn M. Matthews retired in 2016 after serving as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio.

You’re invited to share your reflections on this text in the comments below the post on our Facebook page.

A Bible study version of this reflection is at Weekly Seeds.

For further reflection:

Kathryn Stockett, The Help, 21st century
“All I’m saying is, kindness don’t have no boundaries.”

Mahatma Gandhi, 20th century
“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful then a thousand heads bowing in prayer.”

J.K. Rowling, 21st century
“Indifference and neglect often do much more damage than outright dislike.”

Barbara Kingsolver, Animal Dreams, 20th century
“What I want is so simple I almost can’t say it: elementary kindness.”

Henry James, 19th century
“Three things in human life are important: the first is to be kind; the second is to be kind; and the third is to be kind.”

Dante Alighieri, 14th century
“He who sees a need and waits to be asked for help is as unkind as if he had refused it.”

Aldous Huxley, 20th century
“It’s a little embarrassing that after 45 years of research and study, the best advice I can give people is to be a little kinder to each other.”

The Dalai Lama, 21st century
“If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion.”
“My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.”
“Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive.”

Mother Teresa, A Gift for God: Prayers and Meditations, 20th century
“I would rather make mistakes in kindness and compassion than work miracles in unkindness and hardness.”
“If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other.”

Mahatma Gandhi, 20th century
“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful then a thousand heads bowing in prayer.”

Neil deGrasse Tyson, 21st century
“For me, I am driven by two main philosophies: know more today about the world than I knew yesterday and lessen the suffering of others. You’d be surprised how far that gets you.”

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, 20th century
“We must learn to regard people less in the light of what they do or omit to do, and more in the light of what they suffer.”

John Bunyan, 17th century
“You have not lived today until you have done something for someone who can never repay you.”

Daniel Goleman, Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships, 21st century
“Self-absorption in all its forms kills empathy, let alone compassion. When we focus on ourselves, our world contracts as our problems and preoccupations loom large. But when we focus on others, our world expands. Our own problems drift to the periphery of the mind and so seem smaller, and we increase our capacity for connection – or compassionate action.”

Pema Chödrön, The Places That Scare You: A Guide to Fearlessness in Difficult Times, 21st century
“Compassion is not a relationship between the healer and the wounded. It’s a relationship between equals. Only when we know our own darkness well can we be present with the darkness of others. Compassion becomes real when we recognize our shared humanity.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson, 19th century
“Always do what you are afraid to do.”

Shirley MacLaine, 21st century
“Fear makes strangers of people who would be friends.”

John Holmes, 21st century
“There is no exercise better for the heart than reaching down and lifting people up.”

Henry Ward Beecher, 19th century
“Compassion will cure more sins than condemnation.”

John Green, Looking for Alaska, 21st century
“The only way out of the labyrinth of suffering is to forgive.”

Plato, 4th century B.C.E.
“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a harder battle.”

Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th century
“Compassion is the basis of morality.”

Lectionary texts

Amos 7:7-17

This is what he showed me: the Lord was standing beside a wall built with a plumb line, with a plumb line in his hand.

And the LORD said to me, “Amos, what do you see?” And I said, “A plumb line.” Then the Lord said, “See, I am setting a plumb line in the midst of my people Israel; I will never again pass them by; the high places of Isaac shall be made desolate, and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste, and I will rise against the house of Jeroboam with the sword.”

Then Amaziah, the priest of Bethel, sent to King Jeroboam of Israel, saying, “Amos has conspired against you in the very center of the house of Israel; the land is not able to bear all his words. For thus Amos has said, ‘Jeroboam shall die by the sword, and Israel must go into exile away from his land.'”

And Amaziah said to Amos, “O seer, go, flee away to the land of Judah, earn your bread there, and prophesy there; but never again prophesy at Bethel, for it is the king’s sanctuary, and it is a temple of the kingdom.”

Then Amos answered Amaziah, “I am no prophet, nor a prophet’s son; but I am a herdsman, and a dresser of sycamore trees, and the LORD took me from following the flock, and the LORD said to me, ‘Go, prophesy to my people Israel.’ Now therefore hear the word of the LORD. You say, ‘Do not prophesy against Israel, and do not preach against the house of Isaac.’ Therefore thus says the LORD: ‘Your wife shall become a prostitute in the city, and your sons and your daughters shall fall by the sword, and your land shall be parceled out by line; you yourself shall die in an unclean land, and Israel shall surely go into exile away from its land.'”


Psalm 82

In the divine council
   God has taken God’s place;
God holds judgment
   in the midst of the gods:

“How long will you judge
and show partiality
   to the wicked?

Give justice to the weak
   and the orphan;
maintain the right
   of the lowly
and the destitute.

Rescue the weak
   and the needy;
deliver them
   from the hand
of the wicked.”

They have neither knowledge
   nor understanding,
they walk around
   in shadows;
all the foundations of the earth
   are shaken.

I say, “You are gods,
   children of the Most High,
all of you;

   you shall die like mortals,
and fall like any prince.”

Rise up,
   O God,
judge the earth;
   for all the nations belong to you!


Deuteronomy 30:9-14

and the LORD your God will make you abundantly prosperous in all your undertakings, in the fruit of your body, in the fruit of your livestock, and in the fruit of your soil. For the LORD will again take delight in prospering you, just as he delighted in prospering your ancestors, when you obey the LORD your God by observing his commandments and decrees that are written in this book of the law, because you turn to the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

Surely, this commandment that I am commanding you today is not too hard for you, nor is it too far away. It is not in heaven, that you should say, “Who will go up to heaven for us, and get it for us so that we may hear it and observe it?” Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, “Who will cross to the other side of the sea for us, and get it for us so that we may hear it and observe it?”


Psalm 25:1-10

To you, O God,
   I lift up my soul.

O my God,
   in you I trust;
do not let me be put
   to shame;
do not let my enemies exult
   over me.

Do not let those
   who wait for you
be put to shame;
   let them be ashamed
who are wantonly treacherous.

Make me to know your ways,
   O God;
teach me your paths.

Lead me in your truth,
   and teach me,
for you are the God
   of my salvation;
for you I wait
   all day long.

Be mindful of your mercy,
   O God,
and of your steadfast love,
   for they have been
from of old.

Do not remember the sins
   of my youth
or my transgressions;

according to your steadfast love
   remember me,
for your goodness’ sake,
   O God!

Good and upright
   is God;
therefore God instructs sinners
   in the way.

God leads the humble
   in what is right,
and teaches the humble
   God’s way.

All the paths of God
   are steadfast love
and faithfulness,
   for those who keep God’s covenant
and God’s decrees.

Colossians 1:1-14

Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother,

To the saints and faithful brothers and sisters in Christ in Colossae: Grace to you and peace from God our Father. In our prayers for you we always thank God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for we have heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love that you have for all the saints, because of the hope laid up for you in heaven. You have heard of this hope before in the word of the truth, the gospel that has come to you. Just as it is bearing fruit and growing in the whole world, so it has been bearing fruit among yourselves from the day you heard it and truly comprehended the grace of God.

This you learned from Epaphras, our beloved fellow servant. He is a faithful minister of Christ on your behalf, and he has made known to us your love in the Spirit. For this reason, since the day we heard it, we have not ceased praying for you and asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of God’s will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, so that you may lead lives worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to him, as you bear fruit in every good work and as you grow in the knowledge of God.

May you be made strong with all the strength that comes from his glorious power, and may you be prepared to endure everything with patience, while joyfully giving thanks to the Father, who has enabled you to share in the inheritance of the saints in the light. He has rescued us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.

Luke 10:25-37

Just then a lawyer stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he said, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” He said to him, “What is written in the law? What do you read there?”
He answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.” And he said to him, “You have given the right answer; do this, and you will live.”

But wanting to justify himself, he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?” Jesus replied, “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell into the hands of robbers, who stripped him, beat him, and went away, leaving him half dead. Now by chance a priest was going down that road; and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.

But a Samaritan while traveling came near him; and when he saw him, he was moved with pity. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, having poured oil and wine on them. Then he put him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said, ‘Take care of him; and when I come back, I will repay you whatever more you spend.’ Which of these three, do you think, was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of the robbers?”

He said, “The one who showed him mercy.” Jesus said to him, “Go and do likewise.”

Notes on the Lectionary and Liturgical Colors
by the Rev. Susan Blain, Curator for Worship and Liturgical Arts (
Faith Formation Ministry, Local Church Ministries, United Church of Christ

(Essay based on an article by Laurence Hull Stookey: “Putting Liturgical Colors in their Place” in Calendar: Christ’s Time for the Church ©1996 Abingdon Press.)  

The use of colors to differentiate liturgical seasons is a custom in use among some Western churches for hundreds of years. Although the custom of using colors is an ancient one, there has not always been agreement on what the colors should be. The Council of Trent in 1570, a Roman Catholic response to the Reformation, codified the colors for the Roman Catholic Church. When we talk about “traditional” colors today, we usually are referring to that codification. There were four basic colors in that codification: purple (penitence), red (Spirit or Martyrs memorials), green (long season after Pentecost) and white (festivals). Other colors, or no color at all, were acceptable variants in some regions.

The Reformation of course was a watershed for Christian ritual practice. Anglican and Lutheran churches often used some form of liturgical colors; however, the Reformed tradition of churches, where the UCC falls, for the most part did away with the custom of using colors, opting for much more simplicity. During the ecumenical liturgical movement of the mid-20th Century, Protestant churches began to look back at some of the ritual and colorful practices of the past with an eye toward reclaiming them to help give expression to feeling, tone, and imagery underlying the lectionary stories.

Before the Reformation’s iconoclasm, and Trent’s code, practices varied from place to place, often depending on what was available. Indeed, in some places the custom was to organize vestments into practical categories of “best,” “second best,” and “everyday” — not depending on the color at all. For Christmas and Easter the “best” vestments were used, no matter the color! Other, less prominent feasts or Sundays got “second best” or “everyday.”