Sermon Seeds: Road to Freedom

Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost Year A
Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 19) color_green.jpg

Lectionary citations
Exodus 14:19-31 with Psalm 114
or Exodus 15:1b-11, 20-21
Genesis 50:15-21 with Psalm 103:(1-7), 8-13
Romans 14:1-12
Matthew 18:21-35

Worship resources for the 15th Sunday after Pentecost Year A, 24th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 19) are at Worship Ways

Worship resources for Just Peace Sunday are at Just Peace Sunday


Sermon Seeds

Focus Scripture:
Exodus 14:19-31   
Additional commentary on Matthew 18:21-35
Additional reflection on Genesis 50:15-21 for Just Peace Sunday by Romee St. John

Focus Theme:
Road to Freedom

Reflection:
by Kathryn Matthews Kate_SS_2017.jpg
 
People of faith tend to define–and experience–“faith” itself in different ways. While many people understand faith as an intellectual agreement with, and acceptance of, certain claims about God (one reason institutional churches have articulated a number of creeds throughout their history), they also connect their heads with their hearts, and ground their love for God in what they hold to be true about God. It is very important to them to be clear and even detailed about these intellectual claims, and sometimes to require assent to them.

Other folks, when speaking of faith, go first to the experience of trust in God, a trust that enables them to live their lives not in anxiety but with the conviction that God loves them and holds them precious in God’s sight. Perhaps this kind of faith is not articulated in complex or sophisticated theological statements (and neither can it be required), but it too must be grounded in what a person “knows,” or believes to be true about God.

Bogged down in questions

Reflecting on the meaning of faith may be a good point of entry into this text from the Book of Exodus. We could get hung up on questions about the miracle involved in the sea parting (including the naturalistic explanations that have been offered for it), or we could get bogged down (so to speak) in questions about all those dead Egyptians drowned in the Red Sea. Not unlike last week’s story about the deaths of all those first-born children, this story prompts the question, “What about those Egyptians: doesn’t God love them, too?”

In either case, we would be missing the main point of the people of Israel telling and re-telling, remembering this story about God’s hand at work when they were absolutely “up against it,” up against a wall of water that trapped them before the certainly awesome might of Pharaoh and his armies. This wasn’t one army against another, however outnumbered and outgunned. This was a ragtag group of impoverished ex-slaves escaping their captors not by their own strength or wits or organizational skills or strategic planning, but by the power of God.

Well acquainted with Pharaoh

Can you imagine how they must have felt, their panic and terror, when the vast armies of Pharaoh appeared on the horizon, in hot pursuit? They had lived their entire lives under the heel of this mighty empire, so they were well acquainted with what it could do. However, they were still learning just what their God could do, and how small and powerless the mighty Egyptians would soon appear.

The people of Israel have told and re-told many stories in their long history, but this one, about the Exodus, is right at the heart of their great, over-arching story. This is the story that reminds them over and over again about who God is, and who they are in the light of God’s compassion and care, who they are because God has a commitment to them, grounded in promises given long ago (back in the book of Genesis, we may recall, and the story of Abraham).

Remembering who and whose they are

If it wasn’t clear to them when the plagues came and Pharaoh finally let them go (an amazing thing in itself, no doubt), surely the parting of a great sea of water and the washing away of the mightiest army in the world must have made an impression on the Hebrew people. Walter Brueggemann describes this narrative as “the powerful, compelling center of Israel’s defining memory of faith,” through which Israel comes to understand itself as “the beloved, chosen community of YHWH and the object of YHWH’s peculiar and decisive intervention in public events” (Introduction to the Old Testament).

And that is one reason the story is at the heart of our faith, too. With the voice of the later, Priestly writer so present in the text, it’s possible, says Brueggemann, that Pharaoh himself can be understood as Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian oppressor during the exile of the Jewish people six centuries after the Exodus.

But not just Nebuchadnezzar, and not just the sixth century B.C.: it’s significant, writes Gary Anderson, that this Pharaoh, “unlike almost all other foreign kings in the Bible, however evil they may be, is not graced with a name.” Thus, he can be identified with, and experienced as, every one of the “powers-that-be,” every overwhelming, well-armed oppressor, for he is “as much a cipher for evil as a flesh-and-blood human being” (The Lectionary Commentary: The Old Testament and Acts). If God and empire face off, the story reminds us, in any situation or time, God is always going to win.

God at the center of the story

If we listen to the story that way, with a heart of trust in God’s promises and God’s care, we experience God as the main actor in the story, and realize that it tells us about God’s intention for God’s people. Even at its height, the nation of Israel was never the great power that Egypt, Babylon and Assyria were. They must have always felt small and vulnerable next to those super-powers.

And yet they claimed this particular place under the watchful eye and persistent leading of God, and they had a story that backed up that trust and provided a firm foundation for their faith in God, and their self-understanding and identity as well. James Newsome says that this is a story “of the utter commitment of God to Israel, and of Israel’s fearful doubt. As the story is crafted in this reading, it is a narrative ‘toward faith'” (Texts for Preaching Year A).

Accepting the leader sent by God

So the people’s understanding of God and their identity, and their trust in God, were inevitably strengthened by this experience of deliverance. But so were their understanding of their future, and their acceptance of the leader that God had sent to take them toward that future, that Promised Land.

When the people entered that passage-way carved from the water (another vivid scene from the movie, “The Ten Commandments”), James Newsome writes, they were “a group of refugees, terrified and in panic,” but they “emerged on the other shore in awe and in an attitude of faith in Yahweh for this great miracle of salvation” (Texts for Preaching Year A). Scholars agree that this is another message at the heart of this story: the acceptance of Moses as the leader sent to them by God, worthy of their trust even if he takes them out from the “security” of slavery into a wilderness of possibility.

Stepping out in faith

So what do we learn from this story from long ago that will strengthen our faith, our trust in God today? We learn not to let our fear stop us from “stepping out in faith,” as the saying goes. Gerald Janzen writes elegantly about this kind of faith, which is “the willingness to pick up and carry one’s fear in one’s bosom like a weaned child (compare Psalm 131) and go forward in the direction that trust calls for.”

If fear keeps us trapped in our suffering, then faith as trust is definitely a gift of God: The people of Israel, Janzen writes, are saved from “their fear and their doubt,” not just from the Pharaoh’s armies (Exodus, Westminster Bible Companion). Whether we’re facing a foe as formidable as an ancient empire or as immobilizing as our own fear, God is there to deliver us.

A faith moved to prayer

In fact, the people of Israel, Gary Anderson writes, would look back to this great story every time they would pray, not only in praise for past deeds but trusting in God to come through again and again to “repair matters when things began to break down.” For example, centuries later, during the Babylonian Exile, they remembered God’s past deeds of deliverance and counted on God’s goodness, and they didn’t hesitate to “remind” God of both in their prayers of petition (The Lectionary Commentary: The Old Testament and Acts).

This leads us back to the question of Moses’ leadership and his role in the deliverance of his people (not just his own freedom, but that of his people–we recall that he had escaped Egypt but returned to follow God’s instructions on behalf of the Hebrew people). James Newsome points to another lesson within the text, about the ways of God, at work on behalf of the people, and about our own role in freeing the captives of the world: “Yahweh does not work in splendid isolation or…from afar. Yahweh works through the special agent who has been designated to act on Yahweh’s behalf” (Texts for Preaching Year A). In this case, Moses, but in every age, God calls leaders and agents to act on behalf of those who are held prisoner.

Bringing liberty to the captives

This, then, is the story of which we are a part, a story that, for Christians, continues all the way to Jesus, who declared in his mission statement (in Luke 4) that he had come to “bring liberty to the captives.” Walter Brueggemann sees this sense of call in Jesus, to free captives and heal the sick, to lift up the oppressed and proclaim God’s favor–the “great wonders” we see in Jesus, as God’s own “acts of emancipation and transformation” in every age (Introduction to the Old Testament). That must mean that we, too, are called to bring such good news in our own turn, in our day, wherever we are.  

This God, the one we trust, is the God who makes–and keeps–promises, not only long ago, to Abraham and Sarah, to Moses on the mountaintop, to the people crossing the Red Sea, but to us, a people of faith, a faith that is trust grounded in who we understand God to be. With that trust, and undeterred by fear, we step out, then, in faith to be those “special agents” of God’s love and care in the world.

The Rev. Kathryn M. Matthews retired last year after serving as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio.

You’re invited to share your reflections on this text in the comments below the post on our Facebook page.

A Bible study version of this reflection is at Weekly Seeds.

For further reflection:

Louise Haskins, 20th century, “The Gate of the Year”
“Go out into the darkness and put your hand into the hand of God. That shall be a better light, and safer than a known way.”

Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet, 20th century
“Believe in a love that is being stored up for you like an inheritance, and have faith that in this love there is a strength and a blessing so large that you can travel as far as you wish without having to step outside it.”  

Presbyterian Church USA, Confession of 1967
“Life is a gift to be received with gratitude and a task to be pursued with courage.”

Bruce Epperly, The Christian Century 1-26-10
“When author Madeleine L’Engle was asked, ‘Do you believe in God without any doubts?’ she replied, ‘I believe in God with all my doubts.'”

Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom: Autobiography of Nelson Mandela. 20th century
“I am fundamentally an optimist. Whether that comes from nature or nurture, I cannot say. Part of being optimistic is keeping one’s head pointed toward the sun, one’s feet moving forward. There were many dark moments when my faith in humanity was sorely tested, but I would not and could not give myself up to despair. That way lay defeat and death.”

M. Scott Peck, 20th century
“The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable, unhappy, or unfulfilled. For it is only in such moments, propelled by our discomfort, that we are likely to step out of our ruts and start searching for different ways or truer answers.”  

Madeleine L’Engle, 20th century
“Some things have to be believed to be seen.”

Paulo Freire, 20th century
“We make the road by walking.”

A story from Jim Wallis, 21st century:
“In South Africa in 1987, Nelson Mandela was still in prison, and the world thought for good. School children were being killed daily by government police, and the struggle seemed to be at a standstill. I met a 14-year-old boy who was, like many there, organizing in elementary and high schools. I asked him if he was optimistic for the future and he said, ‘Yes.’ I asked him if he thought there would be a new, free South Africa someday, and he stated to me matter-of-factly, ‘I shall see to it personally.’ …There is simply no other alternative than for each person to see to it personally.”

Also, a website reader of this reflection drew an excellent parallel between Moses, who went back to Egypt to help his people, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who returned to Germany from safety in the United States during World War II. Bonhoeffer’s courage cost him his life; he is the source of the phrase, “the cost and joy of discipleship” in our United Church of Christ Statement of Faith.

Additional commentary on Matthew 18:21-35:   

In our heated political climate, we often hear the national conversation move toward “values” issues, or at least those related to reproduction and sexuality (alas, not so often toward peace, or racial and economic justice). Much of the conversation will claim a faith basis, especially a Christian one, for whatever stand is taken.

Even if we leave the question of the separation of church and state aside for a moment, it’s disturbing that so many people, including communities of faith, focus on these issues and choose to occupy themselves more with judging people based on sexual standards (not well justified by the actions or words of Jesus himself) than with “the heart” of the gospel, as many understand it.

For example, if we spend enough time making judgments about who’s worthy of being fully included in the life of the church (based on the above issues), we don’t have time to confront the challenge of the gospel about many other things, like forgiveness. Forgiving one another is an expectation just as difficult as those around money and possessions, and equally ignored, even though they’re both at the heart of the gospel and the heart of the life of Jesus.

The burdens people bring to church

However, when you think about the folks in your church, can you imagine the longing in their hearts for forgiveness and the struggle in those same hearts to forgive those who have hurt them? So many people come into church every Sunday (and during the week, too) bearing heavy burdens of anger and resentment, and guilt. How much are we helping “the little ones” with this human difficulty that persists in every age and every setting of the church, including our own hearts as we step into the pulpit?

Each and every one of us has been like the first servant who has received grace beyond measure. As Thomas Long describes this man’s situation, it’s “something like saying that a lowly mail-room clerk owed the CEO of IBM a ‘bazillion dollars.’ It was hard to know who was more foolish–the slave, for getting into that size debt, or the king, for extending that sort of credit line to a slave” (Matthew, Westminster Bible Companion).

The immediacy and depth of hypocrisy of this same servant when the tables are turned and he has the opportunity to forgive would be laughable if it did not describe us so well. How good are our measuring scales when considering how much we have been forgiven next to how much we have been injured by others? What do you think is at the core of our failure, or refusal, to forgive?

Grace is free but it isn’t cheap

It seems that last week’s text (Matthew 18:15-20), the passage immediately preceding this one, speaks to the understandable need for the injured party in any dispute to be listened to. Grace may be abundant and freely given, but it isn’t cheap in the sense of being without considerable worth. Like air and water, it is both precious and necessary to life. Therefore, if someone is deeply sorry and has truly heard the pain and injury they have caused, how many times should they be forgiven?

What does forgiveness need to look like in the life of the church and in our own lives? How does forgiveness nurture the health and well-being not only of the community but within the heart and soul of the one who forgives as well as the one who is forgiven? Do we forgive begrudgingly, because of a commandment, or because we have known forgiveness ourselves? Again, the beautiful words of Thomas Long: “We know too well that the little boat in which we are sailing is floating on a deep sea of grace and that forgiveness is not to be dispensed with an eyedropper, but a fire hose” (Matthew, Westminster Bible Companion). Do you dispense forgiveness with “an eyedropper,” or with “a fire hose”?

For further reflection:

Henri J.M. Nouwen, 20th century
“Forgiveness is the name of love practiced among people who love poorly. The hard truth is that all people love poorly. We need to forgive and be forgiven every day, every hour increasingly. That is the great work of love among the fellowship of the weak that is the human family.”

Anne Lamott, 21st century
“Forgiveness is giving up all hope of having had a better past.”

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship, 20th century
“By judging others we blind ourselves to our own evil and to the grace which others are just as entitled to as we are.”

Corrie ten Boom, 20th century
“Forgiveness is an act of the will, and the will can function regardless of the temperature of the heart.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 20th century
“Forgiveness is not an occasional act, it is a constant attitude.”

Jon Krakauer, Into the Wild, 20th century
“When you forgive, you love. And when you love, God’s light shines upon you.”
 
Abraham Lincoln, 19th century
“I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice.”

Additional reflection on Genesis 50:15-21 for Just Peace Sunday
The Thirtieth General Synod called on the congregations of the United Church of Christ to mark the Sunday preceding September 21 (which the United Nation recognizes as the “International Day of Prayer for Peace”) as Just Peace Sunday.

Theme for Just Peace Sunday:
Repent, Reconcile, Renew: The Way of Just Peace

Reflection:
by Romee St. John

Narrative Context:

The book of Genesis begins by broadly covering the history of the world and focuses in on the individual Abraham before expanding to Abraham’s children and their families. On one occasion God speaks to Abraham telling him that his children would be slaves for four hundred years before God brings them out. In Joseph’s story, famine, the injustice of Jacob favoring Joseph, Joseph lording his favored position over his brothers, and Jacob’s eleven sons’ jealousy put the whole family in the land of future slavery. Although Genesis ends with the death of Jacob and Joseph
and the reminder of slavery to come, it also ends on a hopeful note.

First comes the re-uniting of Joseph with his father after his brothers demonstrate empathy and compassion toward Jacob and Benjamin by offering themselves in Benjamin’s place in prison for the sake of their father. Then comes the healing of Joseph and his brothers’ relationships when the brothers choose the path of humility over violence and Joseph chooses the path of grace over revenge. Finally, Joseph assures his brothers that God will bring them out of Egypt by asking that his bones be brought out with them. Christians will later draw parallels between the exodus from Egypt and the death and resurrection of Jesus bringing all humanity out of bondage to sin, which looks toward the total redemption of the world.

Conflicts at Play:

It is important to note the conflicts at play, which are many and complex. There is conflict between God’s promise to make of Abraham a great nation and the potential splitting of Abraham’s children if they cannot set things right. There is conflict between the hope of future freedom and the promise of future slavery. There is conflict between the brothers who know that Joseph is loved more. There is conflict between brothers as Joseph has experienced being sold into slavery. There is conflict between Israel and the Egyptians as different cultures collide. There is a conflict of power reversal as Joseph has to take up a new role with authority over Egypt and his brothers. There is conflict of the unknown as Joseph’s brothers could not know what Joseph would do when their father died and could no longer be grieved by family infighting. There is conflict of the unknown for Joseph as well because he could not really know how genuine his brothers are especially in the time of their father’s death. These conflicts seemed to be at a stand-still while Jacob lived, but when Jacob died the level of vulnerability in
the family was too high and could no longer be avoided.

The Way of Just Peace for Jacob’s Family:

Romee_St_John.jpgJacob’s family escaped the dangers of famine, but found themselves still embroiled in a human-made conflict. The pain of being sold as property into slavery and of your beloved father being deceived into believing that you are dead for years is not a pain that can simply be ignored. Although Joseph tested his brothers to see that they had changed and although Joseph himself presumably planned to do no harm to his brothers, the conflict still boiled under the surface and threatened to tear the family apart.

Despite not being explicitly mentioned in this text, resolving this conflict and reuniting the family required a process called teshuvah, which involves remembering, repenting, and renewing. Although people often think that it is enough to apologize and stop doing the wrong that created pain in the first place, the story of Jacob’s family demonstrates for us that sometimes a mere apology is not enough to create a just peace, and that teshuvah is a necessary step on the way to shalom.

Teshuvah is a word in Hebrew which has literal, relational, and theological meanings, all of which have relevance for understanding the resolution of conflict in our story. The literal meaning of teshuvah is to return. For example, in Genesis 16:9 God tells Hagar to “return” or shuv to her mistress. In this instance, Hagar had travelled physical distance from Sarah, and God was calling her to travel that physical distance back to Sarah.

Later in the Bible, shuv began to be applied to relationships; this is what I call the “relational” sense. In Deuteronomy 30:2, God says “and return (shuv) to the Lord your God and you and your children obey him with all your heart and with all your soul…” (NRSV) In this instance, the distance between Israel and God is not physical but relational. If Israel goes away from God in heart and soul the shuv or return will be a matter of a changing heart.

The theological sense of teshuvah combines the action of returning and the choice of changing one’s heart, with the resulting belief that shalom (peace/wholeness) can only be achieved when not only an attempt has been made to repair the damage done when one wrongs God or another person, but when one commits to actions that have the opposite effect of the harm done. In the story of Joseph and in our lives we must do teshuvah to resolve conflicts if there really is to be a just peace.

By the time the events of Genesis 50:15-21 happened, Joseph and his brothers seem to have taken all the steps people normally associate with repentance, but fear and distrust still ravaged Joseph and his brothers’ relationship. In Genesis 45, Joseph not only refuses to take revenge on his brothers but he tells them not to worry or even stress themselves about what they have done. In Genesis 45, Joseph weeps with his brothers and kisses them giving them many assurances that things are okay.

For many people these proclamations and signs of forgiveness are the essences of repentance and reconciliation, but in this story it was not enough to create a just or whole peace. Joseph’s brothers found themselves still haunted by the memory of what they had done, and Joseph’s power over them combined with everyone’s love of their father made transparent declarations of repentance and forgiveness near impossible. The fact that shalom had not been achieved became clear when their father died and all the brothers’ anxiety came to surface as they feared for their lives. The death of their father created a level of vulnerability necessitating a process of teshuvah.

The first step in the process of teshuvah is remembering. Joseph’s brothers remembered what they did by selling Joseph into slavery. The brothers remembered that this action was driven by evil intent and could never be taken back. Joseph remembered what his brothers had done and remembered everything that happened as a result of what they did.

The second step is repentance. Joseph’s brothers showed some form of repentance when they offered to take the place of Benjamin in jail. Joseph’s brothers also participated in an early process of reconciliation by receiving Joseph’s gifts and hearing Joseph’s reasons to be comforted. This recognition of remembering and repentance brought the family to a tension filled ceasefire. The brothers could live with Joseph and Joseph could live with his brothers, but there was not a connection of brotherly love between them.

To forge the connection of brotherly love Joseph and his brothers had to undergo the third step which is the process of renewing. This step was sparked by the death of their father and concern on the part of the brothers for what might happen to them. In the case of Joseph and his brothers the process of renewing was more than going to back to a time of trust before the brothers sold Joseph into slavery: it was recognizing all that had happened and choosing a path in the reverse direction of the strife they chose before.

Joseph chose to abandon lording his position over his brothers and worked at seeing to the welfare of their children. Joseph’s brothers chose to set aside their jealousy and work with Joseph toward a peaceful community. In the end, this created a united nation of Israel where no tribe had power over the other and it created prosperity amongst them.

The way of teshuvah utilized by Joseph’s family must be the way of Just Peace for our families, churches, and communities today. The purpose of remembering is not only to celebrate some of the past and prevent other parts from repeating, but to discover what grievances have been ignored or suppressed. Once grievances are recognized, repentance must be vocalized or expressed in some clear way.

After the intent to never return to the damaging behavior has been vocalized, we learn from the story of Joseph that it is necessary to renew the relationship by going in a direction that is the reverse of what created the damage in the first place. It is not enough simply to create barriers preventing the harmful behavior from happening again, but by actively pursuing a reverse course one instills habits that also reassure the hurt party that a true change of heart has happened.

For Joseph and his brothers that meant Joseph’s brothers being willing to share their vulnerability and Joseph being willing to care for their families. In a congregational setting it may mean any number of things, but this Just Peace Sunday, let us do teshuvah, learning to remember, to repent, and to renew our relationships with God and one another.

Romee St. John served as an intern this summer with the UCC’s Justice and Witness Ministries office in Washington, D.C.


Lectionary texts

Exodus 14:19-31

The angel of God who was going before the Israelite army moved and went behind them; and the pillar of cloud moved from in front of them and took its place behind them. It came between the army of Egypt and the army of Israel. And so the cloud was there with the darkness, and it lit up the night; one did not come near the other all night.

Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea. The Lord drove the sea back by a strong east wind all night, and turned the sea into dry land; and the waters were divided. The Israelites went into the sea on dry ground, the waters forming a wall for them on their right and on their left. The Egyptians pursued, and went into the sea after them, all of Pharaoh’s horses, chariots, and chariot drivers. At the morning watch the Lord in the pillar of fire and cloud looked down upon the Egyptian army, and threw the Egyptian army into panic. He clogged their chariot wheels so that they turned with difficulty. The Egyptians said, “Let us flee from the Israelites, for the Lord is fighting for them against Egypt.”

Then the Lord said to Moses, “Stretch out your hand over the sea, so that the water may come back upon the Egyptians, upon their chariots and chariot drivers.” So Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and at dawn the sea returned to its normal depth. As the Egyptians fled before it, the Lord tossed the Egyptians into the sea. The waters returned and covered the chariots and the chariot drivers, the entire army of Pharaoh that had followed them into the sea; not one of them remained. But the Israelites walked on dry ground through the sea, the waters forming a wall for them on their right and on their left.

Thus the Lord saved Israel that day from the Egyptians; and Israel saw the Egyptians dead on the seashore. Israel saw the great work that the Lord did against the Egyptians. So the people feared the Lord and believed in the Lord and in his servant Moses.

Psalm 114

When Israel went out
  from Egypt,
the house of Jacob
  from a people of strange language,
Judah became God’s sanctuary,
  Israel became God’s dominion.

The sea looked and fled;
  Jordan turned back.
The mountains skipped like rams,
  the hills like lambs.

Why is it, O sea,
  that you flee?
O Jordan,
  that you turn back?
O mountains,
  that you skip like rams?
O hills,
  like lambs?

Tremble, O earth,
  at the presence of God,
at the presence of the God
  of Jacob,
who turns the rock
  into a pool of water,
who turns the flint
  into a spring of water.

or

Genesis 50:15-21

Realizing that their father was dead, Joseph’s brothers said, “What if Joseph still bears a grudge against us and pays us back in full for all the wrong that we did to him?” So they approached Joseph, saying, “Your father gave this instruction before he died, ‘Say to Joseph: I beg you, forgive the crime of your brothers and the wrong they did in harming you.’ Now therefore please forgive the crime of the servants of the God of your father.” Joseph wept when they spoke to him. Then his brothers also wept, fell down before him, and said, “We are here as your slaves.” But Joseph said to them, “Do not be afraid! Am I in the place of God? Even though you intended to do harm to me, God intended it for good, in order to preserve a numerous people, as he is doing today. So have no fear; I myself will provide for you and your little ones.” In this way he reassured them, speaking kindly to them.

Exodus 15:1b-11, 20-21

Then Moses and the Israelites
  sang this song to the Lord:
“I will sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously;
   horse and rider he has thrown into the sea.
The Lord is my strength and my might,
   and he has become my salvation;
this is my God, and I will praise him,
   my father’s God, and I will exalt him.
The Lord is a warrior;
   the Lord is his name.

“Pharaoh’s chariots and his army he cast into the sea;
   his picked officers were sunk in the Red Sea.
The floods covered them;
   they went down into the depths like a stone.
Your right hand, O Lord, glorious in power —
   your right hand, O Lord, shattered the enemy.
In the greatness of your majesty you overthrew your adversaries;
   you sent out your fury, it consumed them like stubble.
At the blast of your nostrils the waters piled up,
   the floods stood up in a heap;
   the deeps congealed in the heart of the sea.
The enemy said, ‘I will pursue, I will overtake,
   I will divide the spoil, my desire shall have its fill of them.
   I will draw my sword, my hand shall destroy them.’
You blew with your wind, the sea covered them;
   they sank like lead in the mighty waters.

“Who is like you, O Lord, among the gods?
   Who is like you, majestic in holiness,
   awesome in splendor, doing wonders?”

Then the prophet Miriam, Aaron’s sister, took a tambourine in her hand;
    and all the women went out after her with tambourines and with dancing.
And Miriam sang to them:
    “Sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously;
     horse and rider he has thrown into the sea.”

Psalm 103:(1-7), 8-13

Bless God,
  O my soul,
and all that is within me,
  bless God’s holy name.
Bless God,
  O my soul,
and do not forget
  all God’s benefits–
who forgives all your iniquity,
   who heals all your diseases,
who redeems your life
  from the Pit,
who crowns you with steadfast love
  and mercy,
who satisfies you with good
  as long as you live
so that your youth is renewed
  like the eagle’s.

God works vindication
  and justice for all
who are oppressed.
God made known God’s ways
  to Moses,
and God’s acts to the people
  of Israel.
God is merciful and gracious,
  slow to anger and abounding
in steadfast love.

God will not always accuse,
  nor will God be angry forever.
God does not deal with us
  according to our sins,
nor repay us according
  to our iniquities.

For as the heavens are high
  above the earth,
so great is God’s steadfast love
  towards those who fear God;
as far as the east
  is from the west,
so far God removes our transgressions
  from us.

As a father and mother have compassion
  for their children,
so God has compassion
  for those who fear God.

Romans 14:1-12

Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarrelling over opinions. Some believe in eating anything, while the weak eat only vegetables. Those who eat must not despise those who abstain, and those who abstain must not pass judgment on those who eat; for God has welcomed them. Who are you to pass judgment on servants of another? It is before their own lord that they stand or fall. And they will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make them stand.

Some judge one day to be better than another, while others judge all days to be alike. Let all be fully convinced in their own minds. Those who observe the day, observe it in honor of the Lord. Also those who eat, eat in honor of the Lord, since they give thanks to God; while those who abstain, abstain in honor of the Lord and give thanks to God.

We do not live to ourselves, and we do not die to ourselves. If we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord; so then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord’s. For to this end Christ died and lived again, so that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living.

Why do you pass judgment on your brother or sister? Or you, why do you despise your brother or sister? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written,
   “As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me,
       and every tongue shall give praise to God.”
So then, each of us will be accountable to God.

Matthew 18:21-35

Then Peter came and said to him, “Lord, if another member of the church sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as seven times?” Jesus said to him, “Not seven times, but, I tell you, seventy-seven times.

“For this reason the kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who wished to settle accounts with his slaves. When he began the reckoning, one who owed him ten thousand talents was brought to him; and, as he could not pay, his lord ordered him to be sold, together with his wife and children and all his possessions, and payment to be made. So the slave fell on his knees before him, saying, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.’ And out of pity for him, the lord of that slave released him and forgave him the debt. But that same slave, as he went out, came upon one of his fellow-slaves who owed him a hundred denarii; and seizing him by the throat, he said, ‘Pay what you owe.’ Then his fellow-slave fell down and pleaded with him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you.’ But he refused; then he went and threw him into prison until he should pay the debt. When his fellow-slaves saw what had happened, they were greatly distressed, and they went and reported to their lord all that had taken place. Then his lord summoned him and said to him, ‘You wicked slave! I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. Should you not have had mercy on your fellow-slave, as I had mercy on you?’ And in anger his lord handed him over to be tortured until he should pay his entire debt. So my heavenly Father will also do to every one of you, if you do not forgive your brother or sister from your heart.”


Notes on the Lectionary and Liturgical Colors
by the Rev. Susan Blain, Curator for Worship and Liturgical Arts (mailto:blains@ucc.org)
Faith Formation Ministry, Local Church Ministries, United Church of Christ

(Essay based on an article by Laurence Hull Stookey: “Putting Liturgical Colors in their Place” in Calendar: Christ’s Time for the Church ©1996 Abingdon Press.)  

The use of colors to differentiate liturgical seasons is a custom in use among some Western churches for hundreds of years. Although the custom of using colors is an ancient one, there has not always been agreement on what the colors should be. The Council of Trent in 1570, a Roman Catholic response to the Reformation, codified the colors for the Roman Catholic Church. When we talk about “traditional” colors today, we usually are referring to that codification. There were four basic colors in that codification: purple (penitence), red (Spirit or Martyrs memorials), green (long season after Pentecost) and white (festivals). Other colors, or no color at all, were acceptable variants in some regions.

The Reformation of course was a watershed for Christian ritual practice. Anglican and Lutheran churches often used some form of liturgical colors; however, the Reformed tradition of churches, where the UCC falls, for the most part did away with the custom of using colors, opting for much more simplicity. During the ecumenical liturgical movement of the mid-20th Century, Protestant churches began to look back at some of the ritual and colorful practices of the past with an eye toward reclaiming them to help give expression to feeling, tone, and imagery underlying the lectionary stories.  
    
Before the Reformation’s iconoclasm, and Trent’s code, practices varied from place to place, often depending on what was available. Indeed, in some places the custom was to organize vestments into practical categories of “best,” “second best,” and “everyday”–not depending on the color at all. For Christmas and Easter the “best” vestments were used, no matter the color! Other, less prominent feasts or Sundays got “second best” or “everyday.”

So, here is a challenge to worship planners: Take it upon yourselves to develop and expand the “received” tradition!