Last month I posed to readers of The Pollinator the following questions: If you were to give a book related to environmental justice as a Christmas present, which book would it be? What is the one creation-loving book that you would want others to read more than anything else?” In response, I received the following thoughtful and informative responses.
An update from Rev Brooks Berndt, United Church of Christ Minister for Environmental Justice, following the Obama Administration’s announcement that it will deny the final permit needed to construct the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Read more.)
The election of Donald Trump was a shock -- even for many of his supporters and staff. But our disbelief now has to deal with new realities. In just over a week, Trump's transition team released names for several key positions in his pending administration. Many of those picks are quite controversial.
As I indicated previously, there is much to fear if, as expected, Trump moves quickly to implement key parts of his agenda. On many fronts, those of us who disagree with his policies of exclusion, extraction and exploitation will need to work hard and strategically to blunt or divert some of those initiatives.
There is a bit of good news, though. Political transitions are not instantaneous. Drawing on a familiar metaphor, it is like changing the course of an aircraft carrier at sea. Under the best of conditions, it is a slow process, and strong winds can make it even more difficult.
As we begin to sort out what the Trump administration can do quickly, and what will take more time, we can back off on some of our anxiety, and we can be more focused in developing effective action plans. (Read more.)
You can cross-file it under “strange” and “prophetic ,” but the Bible tells us that the prophet Isaiah walked around “naked and barefoot for three years” to make a symbolic statement about the potential future of Egyptians should a full-scale war develop. I thought of this scripture in the wake of the recent presidential election. Various assessments have been made about what the Trump administration will mean for efforts to address climate change. Some sound the alarm while others would seem to almost rationalize complacency with a list of reasons for why we should not be too worried. In this situation, I tend to favor the naked truth. (Read more.)
While sitting as a guest at many tables throughout South America, I was served a variety of foods: chicken and plantains, beans and rice, beef stew and mashed potatoes. But there was one absolute on nearly every table: soda. As an honored guest it would have been rude for me to decline hospitality, so I often indulged, drinking more sugar than I ever had stateside. But in those same gatherings, people often asked me to pray for their sugar-related health concerns, like struggle with fatigue, weight gain, and type 2 diabetes diagnoses. I began to ask a series of questions: why do so many consume soda as an alternative to water, why is soda consumption increasing in developing countries, and what, if anything, can be done to reduce soda consumption? I additionally began to wonder about not only the health impacts of soda but also about what environmental justice concerns might be connected to soda manufacturing.
In a church newsletter, my pastor recently cited a discussion she heard between the columnists E.J. Dionne and David Brooks. They were lamenting the loss of a mainline Christian voice in the public sphere, and Brooks declared that mainline Protestant churches are too weak today to assert such a voice. I will confess that I have had my own moments of similar lament. I have bemoaned out loud the lack of Jesus’ revolutionary spirit in churches today. I have decried the silence and timidity of pastors who are afraid of “controversy” in the church should they dare to speak of justice. Yet, my immediate visceral reaction to reading the comments of Dionne and Brooks was not at all along these lines. Instead, I thought about the overwhelming response to a recent statement by clergy who have called for action in solidarity with Standing Rock. (Read more.)
Deborah Streeter is authorized by the La Selva Beach United Church of Christ congregation in California to practice the ministry of Blue Theology. While becoming a guide at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, she learned how important the oceans are and what challenges they face. This information, paired with her longtime deep spiritual connection to the ocean, lead Deborah on a journey to link faith with the science of marine conservation, coining the phrase “Blue Theology.” Much like the rich and diverse coastal waters of California, Deborah’s ministry at the Blue Theology Mission Station seeks to be a place of “ocean spirit upwelling” for church members and visitors.
This commentary is written by the Rev. Deb Conrad who serves as the pastor for Woodside Church in Flint, Michigan.
A member of my church named Karen Eaton texted me today to say that she had an extra copy of the Flint Journal’s water supplement. She wanted to know if I would like to have it as a resource. “It covers the water crisis from beginning to end,” she wrote. Then, in a separate text, she amended: “Sorry, there is no end.” Who would have thought we’d still be dealing with this? It has been about two and a half years since the water was switched, precipitating the poisoning; it has been more than a year, now, since Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha announced to a room of government officials, activists and journalists that there was indeed something wrong with the water. (Read more.)
Watching the new movie Deepwater Horizon reminded me of an incident that highlights the need for humanity to expand its environmental perspective to encompass outer space along with Earth.
Thanks to data from Envisat, the European Space Agency's large Earth-observing satellite, French scientists were able to alert American officials in May 2010 that the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico had entered the powerful loop current flowing toward Florida. Just a few months earlier, though, the spacecraft had experienced a near calamity of its own because of an environmental disaster in space caused by human beings. (Read more.)
The organizers for the International Days of Prayer and Action with Standing Rock on October 8th-11th have noted an important distinction in their choice of prepositions. They speak not of standing for Standing Rock but standing with Standing Rock. They explain, “It’s one thing to inspire the world to rush to your aid. It’s another thing to inspire the world to stand up for their own water, their own air, their own climate and their own communities.” (Read more.)